Reflections on Gödel’s Ontological Argument
نویسنده
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Experiments in Computational Metaphysics: Gödel’s Proof of God’s Existence
“Computer scientists prove the existence of God” --variants of this headline appeared in the international press in autumn 2013. Unfortunately, many media reports had only moderate success in communicating to the wider public what had actually been achieved and what not. This article outlines the main findings of the authors’ joint work in computational metaphysics. More precisely, the article ...
متن کامل21 7 + ( , 03266
In this paper I present a novel objection to ontological arguments. The argument concerns ontological arguments in general and has the general form of a reductio ad absurdum. Roughly, it rests on the fact that if a sound ontological argument were available, it would contradict the very nature of God. For God aims at maximising the development of human good qualities (including thus faith) and i...
متن کاملReligion ) The Design Argument
The design argument is one of three main arguments for the existence of God; the others are the ontological argument and the cosmological argument. Unlike the ontological argument, the design argument and the cosmological argument are a posteriori. And whereas the cosmological argument could focus on any present event to get the ball rolling (arguing that it must trace back to a first cause, na...
متن کاملPhilosophical Reflections in Transcendental Modernism and Religious Politics
The current article believes that the intrinsic interdependence of modernity, science and secularism is an ideological non-universal interdependence but a hegemonic discourse. This kind of explanation and consideration is built upon a collection of ontological, epistemological, anthropological, methodological and evaluative sources. Based on two laws of "interchangeability of existence and scie...
متن کاملThe Ontological Parody: A Reply to Joshua Ernst’s “Charles Hartshorne and the Ontological Argument”
Charles Hartshorne argues that Kant’s criticisms of Anselm’s onto logical argument were not directed against its strongest formulation. Kant criticised the argument on the famous grounds that existence is not a predicate (B620–30); however, Hartshorne argued that there is a modal distinction that needs to be made between existing contingently and existing necessarily, and while “existence” per...
متن کامل